Are beachfront hotels in Sharm el-Sheikh worth it?
Based on 1 discussion with 3 participants · Last activity: 1 day ago
Based on 1 discussion with 3 participants · Last activity: 1 day ago
TL;DR
Beachfront hotels in Sharm el-Sheikh often disappoint with worn-out facilities, limited food options, and poor beaches. Second-line hotels frequently offer better value for money.
A guest who stayed 14 days was very unhappy: food and staff were terrible, she developed gastro issues, ended up with food poisoning and was hospitalized. Staff also gave confused, incorrect info about medical insurance and a $30 deductible.
The hotel's beach is compared to a crowded Anapa beach: too many people, sunbeds constantly taken, uncomfortable. By contrast, the neighboring Palace hotel is mentioned as having a calm, quiet beach.
At the end of May, one guest felt the beachfront stay was not worth the surcharge: reception charged an extra $20 for a supposedly “renovated” room, but renovation work was still going on behind the wall, even at night. The travelers moved to the neighboring Tropitel the next day; they also complained about old loungers and a dirty beach.
There is also a positive counterexample: one guest was satisfied and felt there was no point paying extra for a pricier 5-star hotel. In that review, no health issues occurred despite eating and drinking at the hotel, and they were able to find suitable food even for a 9-month-old baby.
Based on several repeat stays, rooms in the building closer to the center and the Marina were usually assigned immediately and without extra payment: they are dated, but not disastrously bad. The worst option is the inward-facing courtyard rooms by the pool and live-music area, where noise from music and drunk groups can continue late into the night, with little response from reception.
One advantage is that the beach is large: if you come early, around 7 AM, finding sunbeds is not a problem, especially outside the front row. As an added downside, guests separately mention that internet access is essentially nonexistent.
In early June the hotel was not fully booked — places were available. A notable drawback: tea and coffee are not readily available at the main restaurant during lunch and dinner without extra effort.
The hotel suffers from neglected cleanliness: a flashlight that fell from a staircase lay untouched for the entire 11-day stay — managers walked past without picking it up. Cigarette butts and disposable cups float in the lagoon's shallow area. The only genuine highlight is the coral reef.
Entertainment at the hotel is virtually nonexistent — nothing during the day or evening. Guests reported near-total boredom over a 10-day stay; there are no discos.
For 6 out of 10 days the guest was unable to access their room when needed. There was constant worry about belongings going missing (towels and other items disappeared). The reviewer has stayed at two other 4-star hotels in Egypt across 12 trips and never experienced anything like this.
A guest was initially placed in a block under renovation — dirty conditions, entrance facing the road, and a view of a dusty construction site. A room transfer was only granted after persistent requests on the second day, following multiple refusals.
The hotel's main drawback is pervasive dirtiness: unclean dishes, tables, and floors. While some guests overlook it, those who care about hygiene leave very dissatisfied.